Why I’d Erase Tattoos From History

Published by

on

A minimalist red fist icon centered on a textured white background, serving as the official brand emblem for the "Rebuilding Rob" project.
Daily writing prompt
If you could erase one trend from history, what would it be?

If I could erase one trend from history, I’m sure this choice will earn me some flack, but here we are. If there was one “trend” I could delete, it would be the absolute proliferation of tattoos over the last twenty years.

To be clear: I don’t harbor some deep-seated hatred for tattoos. I don’t have any myself, partly because I’m not keen on the pain, and partly because I’ve always struggled with the idea of committing anything to my skin permanently. I’ve written about this before, specifically in my post Losing My Tattoo Virginity.

My frustration stems from the loss of the “fringe.” There was a time when tattoos were a badge of rebellion—a mark of the counterculture. Today, they are treated as a mandatory uniform for “self-expression.” But there is a glaring irony in this: when everyone has a tattoo, nobody is unique. It’s like when hip-hop slang hits the suburbs or when “back in the day” enters the everyday lexicon of people who never lived it. Once the fringe goes mainstream, the “cool factor” evaporates.

At 52, I don’t have a tattoo, and in all likelihood, I never will. I live by my 100% Policy and Option C, which prioritize keeping my options open. I view my body as my own “empire,” and I’m hesitant to mark it in a way that feels permanent.

I’ve thought about it—if I were to cave, maybe I’d get something related to Batman, my all-time favorite hero since I was five. But what if my tastes shift? Then I’m stuck with a permanent piece of a past version of myself.

Then there’s the aesthetic. Call me old-fashioned, but I find certain placements—namely face and hand tattoos—to be objectively tacky.

But as I sit here writing this, I’ve had to look in the mirror. I realize my resistance to “permanent ink” is a symptom of how much I value evolution. I’ve been on this 1,000-day (and now “beyond 1,000 days”) journey, and it has changed me in ways I never expected. For a long time, I thought this blog was just about the numbers—the streak, the consistency, the vanity of likes and comments.

The truth? I have gotten more out of this writing than anyone who has ever read it.

I used to think a tattoo was the ultimate way to define yourself. Now, I realize that if I were to get one, it wouldn’t be for a fleeting interest or a pop-culture hero. It would be a marker of this process—the red fist, the pillars, the proof that I showed up for myself when it mattered.

Maybe I’m not commitment-phobic. Maybe I just hold myself to a higher standard of what’s worth carving into stone—or skin.


Rebuilding a life takes grit, consistency, and a lot of ‘Option C’ thinking. Having crossed the 1,000-day milestone, I’m now charting the territory beyond. The mission remains the same: No glitz. Just the work. New to the blog? Start your journey here to see the blueprint and the ‘Tricorder’ perspective behind the rebuild.

Thanks for stopping by Rebuilding Rob. Be sure to like 👍, comment and subscribe below. It’s greatly appreciated! Also, feel free to follow me on social media and check out my recent posts!

AI art created by Google Gemini

The article “Why I’d Erase Tattoos From History” first appeared on Rebuilding Rob

Official Rebuilding Rob logo featuring a red clenched fist icon above the title "REBUILDING ROB" and the slogan "NO GLITZ. JUST THE WORK." in clean, bold typography.

6 responses to “Why I’d Erase Tattoos From History”

  1. MaryG Avatar

    With you on this!

  2. […] This post is part of my ongoing “Beyond 1,000 Days” series, where I’m exploring both the world around me and the evolution happening within. If you missed my earlier look at Why I’d erase tattoos from history,  […]

  3. justrojie Avatar

    i also don’t have tats but that’s because i have concerns if i ever need an mri completed

    1. rebuilding rob Avatar

      Do tattoos interfere with an MRI? I’ve never heard that before. I mean, it would make sense.

      1. justrojie Avatar

        it can obscure the view and some tats have metallic pigments that could cause the flesh to burn or swell during an MRI

      2. rebuilding rob Avatar

        I never even thought about that with pigments containing some metallic bits in it. But that makes sense.

Leave a Reply

Discover more from Rebuilding Rob

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading